Showing posts with label investment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label investment. Show all posts

Sunday, 3 January 2016

My Stock Holdings (December) & Happy New Year 2016!


2015 stock market closed without a bang, neither a plunge. But it's undoubtedly a bad fairly lousy year. Starting the year at 3370.59 and ending it at 2893.19, STI dropped 14.16% excluding dividends. Oil price had bottomed to a 11-year low and does not seem to be recovering any time soon. Relevant companies in the oil industries had taken a hit, in particular Keppel Corp and SembCorp.

In my own portfolio, SingPost dropped almost 8% partly because of its CEO's departure and corporate governance problems. In my previous posts on SingPost, I mentioned how much I admired Wolfgang Baier's leadership in transforming SingPost. Now that he is actually gone, a closer watch on SingPost's performance in e-Commerce will be warranted.

Consistently under-performing stocks in my portfolio will also be reviewed soon. (once I submit my FYP report) These stocks actually include Bank of Ireland (BKIR) and HPH Trust. Since buying them almost 2 years back, they had returned almost zero returns. In fact, accounting for inflation and further brokerage fees and foreign custody fees, they were probably negative returns. In the long term, I am pessimistic about HPH Trust since there is little impetus for the share price. Management guidance of allowing dividend payout to follow cash flow should further compress dividend yield. For Bank of Ireland, there should be a slow recovery of its business towards declaring dividend late 2016 or early 2017. However, holding BKIR incurs foreign custody fee at POEMS and it is very vexing. Given the time, I would love to assess whether switching out BKIR and HPH Trust are preferable. (using capital budgeting concepts I learnt in FIN2004X!)

Rounding the "My Stock Holdings" posts for the year, below is the distribution of my portfolio at the end of December.


I received $150 from k1 Ventures through its capital reduction exercise. Adding it all up for the year, I had received $863.19 in 2015!

Since I will be working in mid-2016, I shall aim to achieve $1000 worth of dividend in 2016! This means putting some portion of salary into the stock market, maybe through dollar-cost averaging of STI ETF! Lastly, I shall write another post regarding my investing performance for 2015 as I started my records on 13 January of last year. Included will be breakdown of my Buys and Sells etc. Since I have not sat down to look at my records, writing that post is equally exciting for me!

Once again, Happy New Year and here's wishing everyone out there a prosperous and joyous year ahead! HUAT AH!

Monday, 30 November 2015

My Stock Holdings (November)

November brought down prices of a lot of my stocks, most notably Singapore Post and ST Engineering. I would probably not average down any time soon unless capitulation takes place. At the meantime, their dividends will keep me satisfied. 

I had also bought k1 Ventures at a price of $0.20 on 10 November. This was prior to the capital reduction exercise conducted by the company, in which it gave out $0.015/share to shareholders. k1 Ventures is a investment company and has a great track record of delivering returns to shareholders. It is a bit of a pity that I had noticed this company so late. Between 30 October 2013 to 29 January of this year, the company had return $0.11 of dividends. That's 50% of the price I paid, excluding any capital gains! A risk involved in buying the stock at such a late stage is that most of the monies made from divestment gains had already been given out, hence returns may not be as great as before. Future investments made by k1 Ventures may not be as successful but given the track record, I am willing to place a small amount of money with them in hope of reaping a good returns. However, writing on hindsight with the price standing at $0.183 now, it is unnerving that the stock seem to drop with everything I might touch. The opposite of Midas Touch, perhaps the market is currently not optimal for new investments despite good fundamentals. 



The pie chart shows the current distribution in my portfolio. In the month of November, I received dividends from Keppel Reit and Singpost. Hence the dividends I had received from start of the year to date is $713.19

Sunday, 1 November 2015

My Stock Holdings (October)

Student life is killing me. At my last year of study, who knew things would be so tough. Final Year Projects, meetings upon meetings. Presentations and presentations. Deadlines and more deadlines. Nevertheless for my own sake and maybe to some extent yours, here's my holdings in October 2015.

No change in holdings but it seems that the market is doing well for the last month.




There are no dividends issued for the month of October, therefore it stands at $616.49. 

A number of investment activities in the upcoming month:
Number one is to ballot for some IPO shares of Jumbo. A review of the IPO can be found in Mr IPO's website. I almost always ballot for IPO to sell on the first day unless its a very compelling business. Jumbo does not look to be the exception but I think Jumbo can open at least above $0.30. With only 2 million shares for public subscription, hope is not high to get the shares.

Number two is to indicate to opt for Keppel Reit's dividend in form of shares. I will explain this scheme/decision in the next post, hopefully before the next monthly report.

Sunday, 27 September 2015

My Stock Holdings (September)

Have been busy with school work this month due to Final Year Project and job-finding (holy shit!) hence not much time to update. 

I did buy Keppel Reit at $0.945 on 2 September as part of my income stocks. Also, dividends received in the month of September include $50 from ST Engineering and $86.05 from HPH Trust. 

Dividends Year-to-Date: $616.49


Sunday, 30 August 2015

My Stock Holdings (August)

Portfolio at the end of August:


Note that it's a JPEG because I gave up using Google Sheets. Google keep republishing my charts although I unchecked that option. That is also why I deleted all my previous charts as it was overwritten.

So this month was quite a ride and my portfolio lost a value of $1000. Nothing to sweat about as I'm going for the long-term and not short term volatility. Looking forward, I really hope to buy in ST Engineering on the cheap especially since it had formed a bottom. Straco is really good for averaging down since I have only a small stake in it.

I'm also looking at Reits, in particular K-Reits and possibly Soilbuild Reits. We will see what Singapore market can offer.


In the dividend department, I received an additional $67.50 from Singapore Post.

Dividends Year-to-Date: $480.44

Wednesday, 22 July 2015

My Stock Holdings (July)

Bought Straco at $0.935 as the buy and sell price ($1) was at a huge difference. I had already known the good fundamentals that Straco possessed hence I casually queued at the buy price. Take a look at the EPS growth of Straco over the years since IPO. The CAGR of its EPS is calculated to be 33.08%.

Input that CAGR into the Future Value Calculator together with present value of 4.45cents (current full year EPS), you get an EPS value of $0.1857 in 5 years.

With a low P/E of 8, the stock price can be valued at $1.485 in 5 years. At historical P/E of 21.68 ( from POEMS Stocks Analytics), the stock price can be as high as $4.025.

The exact calculation method can be found here in my blog.


Overall portfolio for July is as follows:

Thursday, 9 July 2015

Singapore Post (S08.SI)

Sustainability of dividend

I like dividend stocks. The money is better in my pocket and tangible rather than getting stuck in the company balance sheet. That is the reason why I like Singpost so much. Having bought Singpost at $0.98 and yielding 6.25c dividend then, it was giving me 6.37% dividend yield. Recently, management raised dividend to 7c, amounting to 7.14% yield. While I welcome the dividend bump, I worry that it may not be sustainable. Many companies spam lots of dividend only to abruptly stop the flow of money when the cash pile depletes.

I've compiled the changes in the cash pile of Singpost over the years and displayed it in the chart below.



As one can see, there is no definite pattern in the change of cash positions year to year. However, it can be seen that the data is skewed towards net increase. Even it out over the years, Singpost has actually increased its cash pile despite giving generous dividends. Increasing yearly dividend by 0.75c will only increase cash demand to the tune of $16.1m (based on outstanding shares of 2,146,774,225). That is less than 10% of the net cash increase during the latest financial year. Therefore, I would conclude barring unforeseen circumstance, Singpost is in good position to service that additional dividend payout.

P/E and P/B valuation


For the full year ended 2014, the EPS was 6.849c. Based on the price of $1.90, Singpost currently has a P/E of 27.7. The P/E is admittedly on the high side as I am more comfortable with stocks with P/E below 20. 

Net asset value per share was 68.40c. P/B is 2.78. Similarly I'm usually not comfortable with P/B value above 1. When trawling the market for gems, I will look for P/B < 1 for safety margin and also for bargain. 

From P/E and P/B valuation point of view, Singpost is indeed overvalued. A P/E of 27 is usually accorded to company with growth potential. Even though Singpost increased its revenue by 12% for the whole year, its underlying net profit only increased by 5.2%. This can be attributed to the low profit margin associated with the Logistics business Singpost is diversifying into. Mail segment is stagnating for a few years but is sadly, the cash cow of Singpost. Can such a high share price justify the high revenue growth but low bottomline growth of Singpost? 

I would hold the stock myself since I bought it low and yield from my capital outlay is good. However, looking at valuations, Singpost is currently overpriced and there are better dividend yielding stocks out there.

Acquisitions and Disposals


In times of boom, companies had been known to go on an acquisition spree only to find that they had overpaid. Singpost, in its bid to diversify from its traditional mail business, had gone through a restructuring. The restructuring included acquisitions of logistics company and disposals of some traditional businesses, together with joint ventures and investments from Alibaba. I'm mainly concerned with the pace of acquisitions and the price that the management paid for the companies. Here's the rundown of the acquisitions and disposals Singpost did for the past year. 

Acquisitions
  • The Store House1
    • Paid S$121,000 for 75% of shares with net tangible asset last recorded as S$11,000
  • F.S Mackenzie2
    • Consideration up to S$14.8m for entire paid up share capital
    • Net asset value was S$5.4m 
  • Couriers Please Holdings3
    • Acquisition at S$105m with prior net tangible asset recorded at roughly S$3m
    • From the change in net profit after acquisition, it seems that Couriers Please Holdings added $9,417,000 to the net profit of Singpost (if assumption is correct, the P/E at which Singpost paid for Couriers Please seems reasonable)
  • Famous Pacific Shipping4
    • 90% holdings for NZ$3.6m with potential consideration up to NZ$8m because of potential earn-out consideration (don't really know what earn-out consideration is)
    • Net asset value is NZ$816,104
  • Hubbed Holdings5
    • Quantium Solutions (Australia) acquired 30% of Hubbed Holdings for S$4.6m
    • Quantium will get 5% more shareholdings if some pre-determined performance benchmark not met. If performance met, Quantium will pay an extra S$1.06m
    • Net asset value of Hubbed Holdings is roughly S$1m 
Disposals
  • Novation Solutions & DataPost (HK)6
    • Entirely disposed of both assets for $24,388,951
    • Net tangible asset recorded as $19,214,000
  • DataPost Pte Ltd7
    • Sold 90% of shares for $39,299,511
    • Net tangible asset was recorded as $30,690,000 
I see that what Singpost paid was consistently much higher than the net asset value the acquired company possessed. However, I also feel that book value of company is not a good gauge for valuation the companies. Singpost itself is valued at nearly 3x P/B. Instead, the EPS of the company would be a better guide to see value. I will appreciate announcements to be like that of Couriers Please where impacts to net profits were shown. Looking at the announcement details, it would seem Singpost paid a reasonable price for Couriers Please and I would hope to extrapolate it to the other acquisitions. 

With the exception of Couriers Please, the other acquisitions were relatively small and should not impact Singpost greatly if it was a bad investment. Furthermore, the capital expenditure for acqusitions is supported by disposals of companies whose considerations were significant. 

From what I heard at Singpost's AGM, the M&A actions are not likely to stop just yet and there are more to come. Chairman was very supportive of the director that oversees M&A.

Earnings


As mentioned at the AGM, revenue rose 12% to the highest ever at S$920m. Underlying net profit similarly rose 5.2% to S$157m, highest ever.  I am disappointed that profit has not kept up with the growth of revenue. This was actually mentioned at the AGM with one lady pointing out that net profit actually decreased. CEO of Singpost reasoned forcefully that in the process of transforming Singpost, there were many charges that cut into profits. They had to strip them out to show that the core businesses were actually doing well. 

What was impressive about CEO Wolfgang Baier, was that he acknowledged the Mail business of Singpost was declining and never going back. 150 years of good business, it's not going to improve. Instead, Singpost had to transform to maintain its competitiveness. I liked his pragmatism and honesty. That is how problems get solved. Many management refused to acknowledge problems and refuse to change or improve. It was my first time attending an AGM and I was really impressed with the management, replying tough questions cordially and directly.


Conclusion


My confidence with Singpost remains strong especially after witnessing the strength of the management. On the day of AGM, it was announced that Alibaba invested a further S$279m in Singpost. Chairman kept reiterating that Alibaba was a tough investor to satisfy. Given that Alibaba had given Singpost their stamp of approval, I will likewise trust my investment in Singpost. 

I will continue monitoring the growth of profit along with growth of revenue. It has been almost 2 years where profit growth had disappointed me. Perhaps at some point, I will realise Singpost is not going to be as profitable as before, but the time is not now. 

Since buying Singpost at 2012, the dividends had paid almost 20% of my initial investment. Hopefully I will hold it till the stock pays itself. While I am not going to sell my holdings anytime soon, I think ultimately at $1.90, Singpost is overvalued and not a value buy for buyers. Dividend yield stands at 3.7% and while this is respectable, there are better companies out there that provides better yield and growth opportunities. Hence, people looking at Singpost, just pray it may drop. I may also increase my shareholdings if it ever drop low enough! (at least 5% div yield). 





Tuesday, 13 January 2015

STI ETF Monthly Investment Plans in Singapore

It's been awhile since my last post. The reason being that I'm currently residing in Sweden for an overseas exchange programme and had been spending the time preparing for this exchange. The cost of living in Sweden is indeed high. A McChicken meal here costs 65 SEK, equivalent of nearly $12 in Singapore. And nope, the portion is the same. The huge expenditure that is going to come with this exchange got me thinking how to recoup the money back eventually. I can only depend on my fixed salary in the future to recoup this expenditure.


However, it is obviously known that the salary is going to be the same every month. How do you maximise this salary that is going to come in every month? INVEST! Like what Warren Buffett once said, "Pay Yourself First". Take out a portion of your salary each month and invest it in monthly investment plans that are provided by POEMS ShareBuilder Plan, OCBC Blue Chip Investment Plan (BCIP) and POSB Invest-Saver. These platforms allow you to invest as low as $100 each month at lower commissions. Once the GIRO instruction goes through, the designated amount will be deducted every month and invested into counters you chose at the start. I highly recommend that you choose one counter to invest in and that is the STI ETF counter. Without going too deep into the subject, STI ETF tracks the STI index and it has been shown that it is very hard to beat the index's return even for seasoned hedge fund managers. So instead of fretting which counters to invest in at the start, I am recommendeding just one: STI ETF



I did a comparison of the three low-cost investment plans and it is shown in the table below.

A few points to note here:

1)  Buying-in Commission

POSB appears to be the lowest cost amongst the three at 1% flat rate. Suppose you choose to invest $100 per month, the commission rate of POEMS itself will be 6%! If you are investing $600 per month, then go for POEMS. $500-$600, you might want to go for OCBC BCIP.

2) Dividend Reinvestment

To me, this dividend reinvestment differentiates POEMS Sharebuilder Plan from the other two. Any dividend from STI ETF will be reinvested the following month. On the other hand, OCBC and POSB only credit the dividend into your bank account. Those who are privy to the power of compounding interest will know that reinvesting dividend will "snowball" your gains over the longer time horizon. Therefore POEMS wins in this aspect.

3) Misc Costs (Dividend Charges, Sell Commission)

After praising POEMS to the sky in point, it's time to point out the elephant in the room. The so-called "hidden costs" in POEMS are pretty high. Any dividend issued by STI ETF will be subjected to a $1 charge. Not mentioned in the table, there are also charges for scrip dividends, corporate actions, insufficient amount for GIRO. Furthermore, the commission that comes with selling the shares accumulated is definitely a downer. From all this, I gather POEMS is trying to attract people that are willing to invest more per month such that all this costs become negligible.
Edit: Self-assisted selling using POEMS is possible at min $25

4) Underlying ETF

The underlying STI ETF that each platform buys differs. However, the difference is minute and should not concern us. For general info, SPDR has a lot size of 1000 shares while Nikko AM has lot size of 100 shares. Also SPDR charges a fund fee of 0.3% per year while Nikko AM charges 0.39%. Again, this only concerns the people running the three platforms.

5) Partial/Total Redemption

POEMS and OCBC allow partial redemption of the shares accumulated. POSB, on the other hand, only allows total redemption. This might be disadvantageous if you are in an urgent need of money. However, since I believe that once you sign up with these investment plans, you should be looking at the time frame of at least 5 years. Therefore this account should not be your piggybank when you want to go on a Europe trip or something. That said, if you happen to run out of money, you can opt to freeze the GIRO payment and continue earn dividends, rather than redeeming the shares for cash
EDIT (18/1/16): Partial redemption of STI ETF units is now possible for POSB.

Conclusion:

If you are investing upwards of $500, go with POEMS for the dividend reinvestment. However, if you are still uncomfortable with the numerous charges that POEMS carries, by all means go with OCBC BCIP. 
If anything between $100-$500, choose POSB because of the low commission cost. Also, if you are new to investing, POSB is good as it is more clear cut with the charges. 

As much as I would like to start this monthly investment plans right now, I'm a poor student that can only afford to invest $100 a month at most. However, I really like the automatic dividend reinvestment provided by POEMS Sharebuilder. Therefore, I'd prefer to start with the Sharebuilder plan when I draw a regular paycheck upon graduation.

Sunday, 6 July 2014

Financial Jargon

Ever saw P/E somewhere in stocks discussion forum? Or EPS in the annual reports of companies? P/E and EPS are some of the financial terms you'll find in the world of investing. Before I start my first case study, it is important to know what the terms mean. They help one to decide the intrinsic performance of a company as well as the valuation of the company in the market. Here are some of the more common terms and also what it represents.

P/E (aka Price to Earning Ratio)
The most common metric that you will find. Normally found alongside stock quotes. The number can be found by the equation: P/E =  Stock Price / Earnings
By Earnings, it is meant as Earnings Per Share
P/E ratio helps to value the stock of a company. It is done by comparing the stock price relative to the income generated. For example, if SingPost has a P/E of 26, the buyer is actually paying $26 for every $1 that the company earns. By comparing the P/E ratio of different companies within the same industry, one can find out which companies are "cheaper".
However, P/E is not a clear cut metric to buy stocks. P/E may be higher because the company is expanding fast. P/E may be low because company is in a unpopular industry. P/E will not even exist if the company is loss-making. You can use more ratios introduced further on to determine whether a company is a "good buy".

EPS (aka Earnings Per Share)
The earnings per share made by the company in a financial year. Normal stated in annual reports. Calculated according to the equation: EPS = Net Profit / Total Shares Outstanding
For example, SingPost has a net profit of $128,175,000 and has an outstanding ordinary share of 1,899,921,000. Using the formula, you'll find that the EPS is 6.75 cents as reported in the annual report. Going a step further to find P/E ratio, the stock price of SingPost is currently at $1.765 while EPS is $0.0675.
Dividing stock price by EPS, P/E = 26.14.

P/B (aka Price to Book Ratio)
Book here refers to the Net Asset Value (NAV) of the company. P/B ratio helps one determine whether the stock is priced at a discount or premium to its tangible assets. ( < 1 represents a discount while > 1 represents a premium)
Comparing P/B ratios between companies of similar industries will help determine which one is a good catch. This is especially important because there are different "standard" of P/B in each industry. For example, land developer normally trade at a discount to NAV while technology stocks trades at a premium.

Dividend Yield
When the company chooses to distribute part of its earnings to the shareholders, the money is termed as the dividend. Dividend yield is calculated by the equation: Annual Dividend / Current Stock Price
Dividend distribution is definitely not indicative of a company's strength. Apple Inc, for example, famously did not pay dividend from 1996 to 2012. The stock price was not held back AT ALL.
However, companies that give away dividend is an added bonus as the cash given back is in your pocket. Furthermore, it shows that the company does have the cash and not just "cooking the book".
SGX had once undergone a S-Chip Scandal episode where it involved a number of  China-based companies listed in Singapore. The companies had suddenly gone bankrupt and was later found to be guilty of accounting fraud. Regular dividend distribution acts as a detector to see a company is potentially fraudulent as real hard cash has to be paid out.
                                                                                                                                               
These four financial metrics are the most common metrics I use to filter out a preliminary list of stocks to invest. Google Finance provides a very good platform to filter out a list based on your required criteria. From there, you research deeper on those shortlisted companies and pick the most promising one. This is what "doing your homework" is when it comes to investing.




Sunday, 8 June 2014

Basics of Buying Stocks No One Talks About

Hopefully after reading some of the books I recommended, you will have a better understanding of investments in stocks. While you may acquire some strategies to spot undervalued companies or sort out your investment objectives, you will realise that you still do not know how to buy/sell a stock. Most investment books do not provide "manuals" on how to buy/sell stocks and you will be overwhelmed when you actually open a trading account. Hence, I aim to bridge this knowledge gap. In addition, I will also touch on some confusing trading jargon I faced during initial stages of investing
.

Stock Quote

In a typical stock quote, you will find the following components: Last Done, Change, Buy Vol, Buy, SellSell Vol, Vol










Last Done: When you buy a stock, you are buying it from a seller. Hence when a buyer's price matches a seller's price or vice versa, there will be a transfer of ownership (from seller to buyer). Last Done is just the price at which the latest transfer of stock took place at.

Change: It refers to the current price change from the prior day's closing price

Buy: Price where buyers want to buy the stock at

Buy Vol (Volume): The amount (volume) of stock that is queueing at the Buy Price

Sell: Price where sellers want to sell the stock at

Sell Vol:  The volume of stock queueing at the Sell Price

Vol: Volume Done up till the current point

Lot/Share?

1 lot = 1000 shares. In Singapore, stocks are generally traded in lots

Stock/Shares/Equity?

These three terms are often used synonymously. They represent the ownership of the company in question.
  

Trading/Investing?

In certain context, they can be used interchangeably. In others, they are as different as day and night. For example, if you want to tell a friend that you've started to gain interest in buying stocks. You can either say "I'm interested in trading stocks/investing in stocks". 
However, in investment contexts, there is a clear line between trading and investing. Trading is regarded as short term buying and selling of stocks in hope for quick capital gains. The time horizon for trading typically range from seconds to weeks. Trading is mostly focused on capitalising market movement of stock prices. 
Investing, on the other hand, focuses on the fundamental of companies. Objective is to ride on the potential growth of companies, leading to higher share price (see how I'm using stock and share interchangeably). Time frame ranges from months to years.   

Relationship between Brokerage Houses & SGX

Brokerage houses are companies that provide the service to buy and sell stocks on the local exchange, Singapore Exchange (SGX). SGX is just like a marketplace where brokerage houses are stallowners that barter stocks instead of meat.   

When you open a trading account at any local brokerages, they will also open a Central Depository (CDP) account with SGX to deposit any stocks you buy. Therefore, SGX also acts like a stock bank.

You may open a trading account at any of these brokerages: DBS Vickers, CIMB, Phillip Securities, Lim & Tan, UOBKH, Standard Chartered, iOCBC

For the full list of brokerages, go to http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/stocks-shares-indices-92/list-brokage-firms-available-singapore-589227.html for more information.


Hopefully, I have answered some of the common beginners' question here. I understand that one may have too many questions when starting out in investing, hence you can always drop a comment. I'll update this post whenever there is a question asked (which I highly doubt so since it's so obscure!)
Peace out~!

Thursday, 5 June 2014

Reading List for New Investors

I started my investing journey solely by reading a few select books recommended by people on the Internet. I would use to read them during rest time or the long waiting in the firing range. Army mates used to ridicule me for reading investment books instead of playing PSP or cards. Some gave snide remarks like, "You have the money to invest meh?". Looking back, those are time well spent!

Below is the list of books I've read and I will also TRY to recall some of the key concepts covered in each book and the usefulness of it. Please pardon if it is somewhat erroneous because these are books I read between 1 - 3 years ago! 

A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time Tested Strategy for Successful Investing by Burton G. Malkiel
This lengthy-titled book gives readers a general guide to navigating the financial market. For instance, he advises that investors use four basic determinants to help estimate proper values of companies.

  1. Expected rate of growth. Larger growth rate of earnings and dividends, higher the price.
  2. Expected dividend payout. Higher percentage of dividend payout, higher the price. However, other factors are not considered. Poor prospect company may pay good dividend while expanding company may hold back dividend like Apple. 
  3. Degree of risk. Naturally, higher risk, lower price.
  4. Level of market interest rate. Lower interest rates, increase in stock price expected. 
In addition, the author recognises that an average investor will find it hard to beat the market. Hence he has a few recommendations for us. These include saving to invest, buying your own house, understanding your own investment objectives before investing


The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham
Benjamin Graham is one of the "founding fathers" of value investing. Warren Buffet, himself, was mentored by Graham. While the book does not impart techniques to specifically select stocks, it discusses a wide range of topics. Eg. Investment vs Speculation, Portfolio Allocation, Dividend Policy.
The book provides an excellent foundation for beginners to learn investing; the principles of investing. Personally the book had convinced me to go for investing compared to trading. Though many use these terms synonymously, there is a big difference between these two which I will discuss some other day.

The Warren Buffet Stock Portfolio: Warren Buffet Stock Picks: Why and When by Mary Buffet, David Clark
This was the latest book I had read during the free time in reservist. In this book, we are introduced to how Warren Buffet chooses companies to invest in. Basic concept is to have the company possess a reasonable economic moat and increasing EPS (earnings per share).
Using the increment EPS, the book further teaches us how to project the stock's future price and see whether it's "potential" gain might warrant a buy now.
Ever since reading this book, I had only exclusively used this method to value a stock. I would say the method was fairly accurate because the screening of economic moat and increasing EPS had already ensure that the company is very strong.


Winning the Loser's Game by Charles D. Ellis
Along the same line as the above-mentioned  books, Charles aims to tell readers how to behave rationally in the stock market. Also, how to balance their portfolio of companies. The mix is determined partly your purpose of investing purposes (for growth, passive income or inflation?). He also advises investor to diversify within each asset class and between asset class.
This book covers what in already in Benjamin Graham's and Burton's books. So if you are not keen in reading, you can skip this book for the other two.


Books are the first step towards the world of investing and it is imperative that one read at least one or two books. This ensures that the person knows what is his investment objectives and can work gradually towards them.

Saturday, 31 May 2014

First Post

This is the official first post of this investment-related blog. Because I have not done blogging for a few years now, I'm not well-versed in the mechanics of blogging. So I'll introduce my profile here in first post instead and also state my intention of starting this blog.

Profile

I am a 23 years old student currently studying Chemical Engineering at National University of Singapore. I first picked up investment knowledge during the lull periods of my army days. My first purchased stock goes back to 8 November 2011. This translates to me heading into the third year of my investment journey!

My interest in stocks are primarily due to my relatives and parents who trade stocks for capital gains and also to stave off their gambling needs. My investment influences come from successful individuals like Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffet. As you can infer, I am more of a investor rather than a trader. Consequently, I will touch on fundamental aspects of companies. 


Purpose

-  To help my peers who are not well versed in investing.  
A number of my female friends have already started on their careers. However, when quizzed about their savings or thoughts on investing, I was surprised to learn that they have no such plans. While I promised to teach them, I have no much spare time to individually introduce them to the world of investments. Hence this blog

- To share and receive good investment ideas
Like many other investment blogs floating around in the internet, I strive to share ideas about undervalued stocks and also receive feedbacks. This will aid me in my journey to gaining more insights in the stock market. Furthermore, I am currently at a crossroad between pursuing a engineering career or an investment career. I hope to meet people from these two industries who can provide valuable advice!

- Archival purposes
Anything written by me here is as it is. Years down the road, this blog will serve as a record when I look back at my investment decisions.


So, this is the end of my first post and I hope that it gives some foreshadowing for what is to come later. The next post shall be about the types of books I've read as a beginner and recommend to newbie investors. In addition, I will give reviews of the brokerages I am using and let newcomers decide which one to use.